Hearst can buy the Bring a Trailer community but it can’t own it.”
As the shock and awe of the sale of Bring a Trailer subsides, we asked the founder of eBay Motors, Simon Rothman, for his thoughts about the sale and his predictions for the future.
He said, “Over time, Hearst will absorb Bring a Trailer, and they won’t be able to keep from changing it.”
I first met Simon in 2002. eBay had just purchased the auction company Kruse International for a reported $145 million in cash and stock. That was an eye-popping number.
Dean Kruse was quoted on the website of KPC News in Kendalville, IN, as saying, “When eBay Motors first asked me for a number, I figured maybe $10 million to $15 million. When they gave me their number I almost wet my pants!”
In the end the acquisition was a failure, with Dean Kruse buying back his auction company just three years later for what was said to be “pennies on the dollar.”
Rothman noted that the acquisition of Kruse was part of an effort by eBay to change the demographics of its customers by reaching new ones.
“Prior to launching eBay Motors, the typical eBay client was a middle-aged woman in the Midwest buying and selling knick-knacks.”
In any case, eBay Motors experienced meteoric growth from $1 billion in sales in 1999 to $14 billion by 2005. It also changed the profile of eBay users dramatically.
“We would have succeeded whether or not we had purchased Kruse. But the acquisition accelerated our participation in the marketplace,” Rothman said.
“All acquisitions look good on paper,” Rothman said. “But they rarely work out. Synergies that are put on paper to justify an acquisition don’t often play out in the real world. When a big company buys a small one, the small company goes from a feisty upstart in control of its destiny to fighting for resources within a larger organization that has its own goals.
“When the owners of BaT have their ‘liquidity moment’ — and are fully paid for the sale — it is highly unlikely that they will continue with the company after any contractual obligations have been fulfilled. The people who made the magic will be gone.
“You have to remember that as a startup, BaT had everything to gain and nothing to lose by taking risks. That’s the exact opposite of a successful company like Hearst. I assume they paid top dollar for BaT. Hearst is not a holding company — they didn’t buy BaT to simply let it run itself and collect profits at the end of the year.”
Rothman commented that Hearst surely had a list of synergies that they believe would allow them to increase the profitability of BaT, which is necessary to justify the purchase price. In order to get a return, they will have to make changes to BaT to make more money from it. BaT will also have to fit within the Hearst corporate structure — they won’t have a choice.
“BaT has created a beautiful marketplace,” Rothman said, “with its engaged user community. Its relatively small size has allowed it to create a bespoke website tailored specifically to its needs.”